One nice thing about the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) data is that it is available at least in preliminary summary form every day from the University of Maine (UM) Climate Change Institute (CCI). They have now posted preliminary data for all of January 2016 which has been used to produce the graphs presented here. For those new to this data, it is derived from the US National Center for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Global Forecast System (GFS) global weather model run inputs four times each day and is currently Version 2. The CFSR data are also processed and reported by WxBell and their output is usually very close to that provided by UM CCI:
The UM CCI CFSR summary maps and graphs are here:
The UM CCI January daily CFSR show a continuation of the large high spikes in global temperature anomaly estimates that began in October 2015 and may be associated with the El Niño pattern. The highest spikes in daily global temperature anomalies have coincided largely with the highest spikes in Arctic temperature anomalies which may be at least partially a result of warm El Niño air being advected into the Arctic for dissipation. Figure 1 shows the daily CFSR global temperature anomaly estimates since 2014 (click on the graph for more detail). The January estimates are preliminary and are based on the UM CCI reported values adjusted using a linear fit derived from the October through December preliminary versus final estimates.
Figure 2 shows the monthly CFSR trend in global temperature anomaly estimates for the current century so far, since 2001. The October through December 2015 monthly estimates were calculated from the UM CCI final daily values. They have not yet reported the final October through December monthly values, which may be slightly different. The January 2016 value is preliminary and is based on the adjusted UM CCI preliminary daily data described above.
The 21st Century CFSR global monthly temperature anomaly estimates continues to show a substantial downward trend, despite the recent upward spike since October 2015. The current trend is -0.001 degrees Celsius (C) per month, which corresponds to -0.18C over the 15 year and one month period and to -1.2C per century if maintained. Considering a likely uncertainty on the order of plus or minus 0.3C to 0.5C, the current trend for this century so far is well within the uncertainty range, and thus a real trend cannot yet be confidently established. Regardless however, there does not appear to be a large upward trend in temperature so far this century. A century trend of +2C would correspond to a 15 year trend of +0.3C, which would barely be detectable with low confidence, so we can say with confidence that we are not seeing such a high trend as predicted by most long-range climate models. That in turn indicates a poor performance by these models.
The preliminary January CFSR global temperature anomaly estimate of 0.51C is slightly lower than the 0.55C for December and may indicate the beginning of a downward trend in coming months as the El Niño slowly fades away. At face value, the implied January global temperature estimate of 13.0C ties 2005 for the second highest January in the CFSR record since 1979. The highest January was 13.1C in 2007. Within an uncertainty of plus or minus 0.3C to 0.5C, we cannot really determine which of these January global temperature estimates was the highest.
The CFSR data begin in 1979 and the trend for the entire period through January 2016 is shown in Figure 3. The trend for this period of 37 years and one month is +0.0011C per month, which corresponds to +0.48C for the period and to +1.32C for 100 years if maintained.
Thus considering an uncertainty of about plus or minus 0.3C to 0.5C, there is only marginal confidence in this small upward trend for the period. Even if this trend continues for a full 100 years, it will still be well below the 2C per century and higher projections from long-range global climate models.
For for the latest CFSR daily and monthly updates to key figures, see the Daily Updates and Monthly Trends pages accessible from the menu bar at the top of this page.
I recently found annual average temperatures from the weather station at the top of Mount Washington in New Hampshire in the northeastern US at an elevation of 1,912 meters (6,274 feet). Measurements from this site may be fairly representative of temperature changes over time in the lower troposphere for higher latitudes in the Northern Hemisphere. Figure 4 shows the Mount Washington annual temperature trend for 1949 through 2015.
The temperature measurements at Mount Washington show a slight downward trend of -0.0115C per year, which corresponds to -0.77C over the 67 year period and to -1.15C over a 100 year period if maintained. There is certainly no indication of warming at this location.
Update 2016 February 11
The Mount Washington data graphed above was obtained from the Weather Warehouse at the following link:
I thought it was a bit odd how much the annual mean temperatures varied from year to year and I was a bit surprised how cold the annual temperatures were. So I decided to try and corroborate the data using the daily data available on the Weather Underground (WU). I had to retrieve a year at a time of daily data, but managed to get daily temperature average, minimum, and maximum data for 1973 to current and then calculated annual average temperatures. The results do not match the Weather Warehouse data. The average temperature over the entire period from 1973 through 2015 for the Weather Underground data was -2.5C as compared to -14.8C for the Weather Warehouse data. The WU lowest annual average was -3.8C for 1980 and highest was -0.9C for 2012, showing much less range than the Weather Warehouse data which ranged from -21.4C in 2004 to -8.9C in 2006. The long-term average temperature from the WU data are more in line with the -2.6C mean temperature for 1981-2010 reported in Wikipedia. Therefore, I am now very doubtful that what was obtained from Weather Warehouse is correct.
I went to the US National Center for Environmental Information (NCEI) and retrieved daily data by month to spot check the WU data. It appears that the WU data were derived from hourly observations and do not fully reflect the maximum and minimum temperatures on most days. Therefore, I plan to download the NCEI data to compile annual averages since 1948 and will make a post about the results.